Official subreddit for the Cryptocurrency Investing community, focused around the Ethereum Investing/Cryptocurrency Investing website and Facebook group. Join us on Facebook here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/303525260097501/ Find our website and blog here: https://www.ethereuminvesting.info
01-16 10:43 - 'Is there a way to tell when BTrash will be more profitable to mine than BTC? I want to dump it on the next pump.' (self.Bitcoin) by /u/brucefaceheadface removed from /r/Bitcoin within 69-79min
What is the best way to explain to someone that bitcoin isn't a pre-mined pump and dump scheme?
I was trying to sell my friends on bitcoin and they asked me why I consider it more valid than altcoins. I told them that altcoins are premined and just a scam to make the early adopters quick money. Then they pointed out that in my best-cast-scenario of bitcoin being widely adopted overnight, it is already more than 50% premined. I can't see any fault in their logic... Help me out here! I'm having a crisis of faith. 0% of people use bitcoin, yet more than half that exist are already mined and owned. In the grand scheme of things, how is bitcoin any different than the pre-mined altcoins we give shit to? The only way for any sort of mass adoption to take place at this point is for people to buy in with fiat, doesn't that effectively make bitcoin a pump and dump scheme?
Welcome to the Daily Discussion. Please read the disclaimer, guidelines, and rules before participating. Disclaimer: Though karma rules still apply, moderation is less stringent on this thread than on the rest of the sub. Therefore, consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here. Rules:
All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
The next XVG? Microcap 100x potential actually supported by fundamentals!
What’s up team? I have a hot one for you. XVG returned 12 million percent in 2017 and this one reminds me a lot of it. Here’s why: Mimblewimble is like Blu-Ray compared to CD-ROM in terms of its ability to compress data on a blockchain. The current BTC chain is 277gb and its capacity is limited because every time you spend a coin, each node needs to validate its history back to when it was mined (this is how double spending is prevented). Mimblewimble is different - all transactions in a block are aggregated and netted out in one giant CoinJoin, and only the current spending needs to be verified. This means that dramatically more transactions can fit into a smaller space, increasing throughput and lowering fees while still retaining the full proof of work game theory of Bitcoin. These blockchains are small enough to run a full node on a cheap smartphone, which enhances the decentralization and censorship resistance of the network. The biggest benefit, though, is that all transactions are private - the blockchain doesn’t reveal amounts or addresses except to the actual wallet owner. Unlike earlier decoy-based approaches that bloat the chain and can still be data mined (XMR), Mimblewimble leaves no trace in the blockchain, instead storing only the present state of coin ownership. The first two Mimblewimble coins, Grin and Beam, launched to great fanfare in 2019, quickly reaching over $100m in market cap (since settled down to $22m and $26m respectively). They are good projects but grin has infinite supply and huge never-decreasing emission, and Beam is a corporate moneygrab whose founding investors are counting on you buying for their ROI. ZEC is valued at $568m today, despite the facts that only 1% of transactions are actually shielded, it has a trusted setup, and generating a confidential transaction takes ~60 seconds on a powerful PC. XMR is a great project but it’s valued at $1.2b (so no 100x) and it uses CryptoNote, which is 2014 tech that relies on a decoy-based approach that could be vulnerable to more powerful computers in the future. Mimblewimble is just a better way to approach privacy because there is simply no data recorded in the blockchain for companies to surveil. Privacy is not just for darknet markets, porn, money launderers and terrorists. In many countries it’s dangerous to be wealthy, and there are all kinds of problems with having your spending data be out there publicly and permanently for all to see. Namely, companies like Amazon are patenting approaches to identify people with their crypto addresses, “for law enforcement” but also so that, just like credit cards, your spending data can be used to target ads. (A) Coinbase is selling user data to the DEA, IRS, FBI, Secret Service, and who knows who else? (B) What about insurance companies raising your premiums or canceling your policy because they see you buying (legal) cannabis? If your business operates using transparent cryptocurrency, competitors can data mine your customer and supply chain data, and employees can see how much everyone else gets paid. I could go on, but the idea of “I have nothing to hide, so what do I care about privacy?” will increasingly ring hollow as people realize that this money printing will have to be paid by massive tax increases AND that those taxes will be directly debited from their “Central Bank Digital Currency” wallets. 100% privacy for all transactions also eliminates one HUGE problem that people aren’t aware of yet, but they will be: fungibility. Fungibility means that each coin is indistinguishable from any other, just like paper cash. Why is this important? Because of the ever-expanding reach of AML/KYC/KYT (Anti-Money Laundering / Know Your Customer / Know Your Transaction) as regulators cramp down on crypto and banks take over, increasingly coins become “tainted” in various ways. For example, if you withdraw coins to a mixing service like Wasabi or Samourai, you may find your account blocked. (C) The next obvious step is that if you receive coins that these chainalysis services don’t like for whatever reason, you will be completely innocent yet forced to prove that you didn’t know that the coins you bought were up to no good in a past life. 3 days ago, $100k of USDC was frozen. (D) Even smaller coins like LTC now have this problem, because “Chinese Drug Kingpins” used them. (E) I believe that censorable money that can be blocked/frozen isn’t really “your money”. Epic Cash is a 100% volunteer community project (like XVG and XMR) that had a fair launch in September last year with no ICO and no premine. There are very few projects like this, and it’s a key ingredient in Verge’s success (still at $110m market cap today despite being down 97% since the bubble peak) and why it’s still around. It has a small but super passionate community of “Freemen” who are united by a belief in the sound money economics of Bitcoin Standard emission (21m supply limit and ever-decreasing inflation) and the importance of privacy. I am super bullish on this coin for the following reasons:
Only $400k market cap
Supply started at zero, so there are no VC’s and team to dump on you into the pumps - all coins are mined into existence, just like Bitcoin.
It just had its first halving, reducing emission from 16 to 8 per block. Between now and 2028 there are FOUR (!) more halvings, from 4 to 2 to 1 and then finally 0.15 (I guess that would be an 85%-ing :p) and at this point the supply is the same as BTC and stays in sync forever until the last coin is mined in 2140. This simple supply curve is already accepted by the market as a winner, so why mess with success? (I)
Meets Andreas Antonopolous’ 5 pillars of open blockchains test: Public, Open, Borderless, Neutral, and Censorship Resistant. (How many coins can say this?)
Unlike Bitcoin, Epic created a multi-algorithm approach that enables people to mine on ordinary computers - 60% for CPU on RandomX, 38% for GPU on ProgPow, and 2% for ASIC’s on Cuckoo31+. The algorithms don’t compete with one another. This is essential for leveling the playing field and preventing massive farms from dominating. These percentages can change over time and new algorithms can be easily dropped in. You can mine today using an old laptop and in 5 years you will still be able to. Incidentally, there is nothing standing in the way of adding mobile phone-based mining, which ETN showed there’s a huge demand for.
Based off the excellent Grin codebase, which means they continue to pull in ongoing core code enhancements and focus on ease of use and market penetration instead. (Smart!)
Litecoin’s Charlie Lee is out there daily talking about their move to Mimblewimble, which provides free publicity. What people don’t realize is that you can’t just bolt on Mimblewimble to a legacy blockchain, that’s like putting a Ferrari engine into a school bus - it’s still a school bus, not a race car! LTC is doing it as an optional soft fork via “extension blocks” which will not be supported by all wallets and exchanges. Also, anyone using “optional” privacy features is declaring themselves to be suspicious, which kind of defeats the point for people who care about privacy.
The community is friendly and welcoming to new people coming in, with lots of helpful (independently created) tutorials and guides. (F)
It’s already a global phenomenon, with the whitepaper in 20+ languages (G) and (not bot-infested) active local-language communities on not only Telegram but also Wechat, LINE, QQ and other messenger platforms.
It’s only on two random little exchanges currently, Citex and Vitex. Vitex is actually a pretty good DEX with no KYC and a great mobile wallet.
They are very creative - since centralized exchanges want huge money to list, they created a non-inflationary ERC20 tracker token that’s exchangeable 1:1 for coins so that Uniswap trading is possible (H)
Because it doesn’t have a huge marketing budget in a sea of VC-funded shitcoins, it is as-yet undiscovered, which is why it’s so cheap. There are only 4 Mimblewimble-based currencies on the market: MWC at $162m, BEAM at $26m, GRIN at $22m, and EPIC at $0.4m. This is not financial advice and as always, do your own research, but I’ve been buying this gem for months and will continue to. This one ticks all the boxes for me, the only real problem is that it’s hard to buy much without causing a huge green candle. Alt season is coming, and coins like this are how your neighbor Chad got his Lambo back in 2017. For 2021, McLaren is a better choice and be sure to pay cash so that it doesn’t get repossessed like Chad!
Ok here’s my theory I came up with: The fed or other banking group who is anti-Bitcoin deliberately dumped a large amount of BTC at the same time as the stock market crash to create the illusion that they are massively correlated. Whilst this may sound crazy - ask yourself: If the Fed knew this crash was coming -would they want all stock market traders to convert all their funds into Bitcoin? No they wouldn’t - so it would make a lot of sense for them to do this. What do you think?
https://preview.redd.it/dju4oz1g16c51.jpg?width=2400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=fe57edcd81ffa31bff95fe3026055020f7720dce Cryptocurrencies have now become a buzz word. Despite the resilience that it faced initially, cryptocurrencies have come a long way. There are a total of around 5000 cryptocurrencies circulating in the market. If you plan to make a career in this domain, you need to run through the following questions. 1. What is a cryptocurrency? Cryptocurrency is a digital currency that is transacted on a distributed ledger platform or decentralized platform or Blockchain. Any third party does not govern it, and the transaction takes place between peer-to-peer. 2. When was the first Cryptocurrency introduced? The first Cryptocurrency or Bitcoin was introduced in the year 2009. 3. Who created Cryptocurrency? Satoshi Nakamoto gave the first Cryptocurrency. The white paper for the same was given in 2008 and a computer program in 2009. 4. What are the top three cryptocurrencies? The following are the three cryptocurrencies: • Bitcoin (BTC) $128bn. • Ethereum (ETH) $19.4bn. • XRP (XRP) $8.22bn. 5. Where can you store Cryptocurrency? Cryptocurrencies are stored in a digital wallet, and this is accessible via public and private keys. A public key is the address of your wallet, and the private key is the one that helps you in executing the transaction. 6. Which is the safest wallet for Cryptocurrency? The most secured wallet for Cryptocurrency is a hardware wallet. It is not connected to the internet, and thus it is free from a hacking attack. It is also known as a cold wallet. 7. From where I can purchase cryptocurrencies? The easiest way to buy Cryptocurrency is via crypto exchange. You can several crypto exchanges like Coinbase, Bitbuy, CHANGENow, Kraken etc. 8. What are the ten popular crypto exchanges? The following are the best ten popular crypto exchange:
9. What are the key features of Blockchain? We all know that Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency runs on the Blockchain platform, which gives it some additional features like decentralization, transparency, faster speed, immutability and anonymity. 10. What is AltCoin? It means Alternative Coin. All the cryptocurrencies other than Bitcoin are alternative coins. Similar to Bitcoin, AltCoins are not regulated by any bank. The market governs them. 11. Are cryptocurrency sites regulated? Most cryptocurrency websites are not regulated. 12. How are Cryptocurrency and Blockchain related? Blockchain platform aids cryptocurrency transactions, which makes use of authentication and encryption techniques. Cryptography enables technology for Cryptocurrency, thus ensuring secure transactions. 13. What is a nonce? The mining process works on the pattern of validating transactions by solving a mathematical puzzle called proof-of-work. The latter determine a number or nonce along with a cryptographic hash algorithm to produce a hash value lower than a predefined target. The nonce is a random value used to vary the value of hash so that the final hash value meets the hash conditions. 14. How is Cryptocurrency different from other forms of payment? Cryptocurrency runs on Blockchain technology, which gives it an advantage of immutability, cryptography, and decentralization. All the payments are recorded on the DLT, which is accessible from any part of the world. Moreover, it keeps the identity of the user anonymous. 15. Which is the best Cryptocurrency? Several cryptocurrencies have surged into the market, and you can choose any of these. The best way to choose the right cryptocurrencies is to look at its market value and assess its performance. Some of the prominent choices are Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, XRP etc. 16. What is the worst thing that can happen while using Cryptocurrency? One of the worst things could be you losing your private keys. These are the passwords that secure your wallet, and once they are lost, you cannot recover them. 17. What is the private key and public key? Keys secure your cryptocurrency wallet; these are public key and private key. The public key is known to all, like your bank account number, on the hand, the private key is the password which protects your wallet and is only known to you. 18. How much should one invest in Cryptocurrency? Well, investing in Cryptocurrency is a matter of choice. You can study how the market is performing, and based on the best performing cryptocurrency, you can choose to invest. If you are new to this, then it’s advisable that you must start small. 19. From where can one buy Bitcoin using Fiat currency? Two of the popular choices that you have are Coinbase and Binance, where you can purchase Cryptocurrency using fiat currency. 20. Are the coins safe on exchanges? All the exchanges have a high level of security. Besides, these are regularly updated to meet the security requirements, but it’s not advisable to leave your coins on them since they are prone to attack. Instead, you can choose a hard wallet to store your cryptocurrencies, which are considered the safest. 21. What determines the price of cryptocurrencies? The price of cryptocurrencies is determined by the demand and supply in the market. Besides, how the market is performing also determines the price of cryptocurrencies. 22. What are some of the prominent cryptocurrencies terminologies? There are jargons which are continuously used by people using cryptocurrencies are: DYOR: Do Your Own Research Dapps: Decentralized Applications Spike: Shapr increase in the price of the Cryptocurrency Pump: Manipulated increase in the price of a cryptocurrency Dump: Shapr decline in the price of Cryptocurrency 23. How can I check the value of cryptocurrencies? Various platforms will give you an update on the price of cryptocurrencies. You can keep a tab on them and check the pricing of cryptocurrencies. 24. What are the advantages of using digital currencies? There are various advantages like you are saved from double-spending, the transactions are aster and secure. Moreover, digital currencies now have global acceptance. 25. What is the difference between cryptocurrencies and fiat currencies? Cryptocurrencies are digital currencies which run on the Blockchain platform and are not governed by any government agencies, while the fiat currencies are the ones which are governed by authorities and government. Conclusion- This was all the FAQs pertaining to cryptocurrency, for more such information keep coming back to Blockchain Council.
Three suggestions for better boundaries between Monero and Tari
I write this as a multi-year Monero contributor to the subreddit, the CCS, and minor commits to both the CLI and GUI. However, my Reddit account is newish since I regularly delete my Reddit account every six months or so out of privacy concerns, so let my words in this post act as proof of my grasp of Monero and our community's values. I have been increasingly confused by how intermingled the goals of Monero have become with Tari. Naturally, I could care less if someone wants to merge-mine with Monero. But last week we had dEBRUYNE, longtime excellent mod of this subreddit, break the subreddit's own rules to announce Tari's testnet. So naturally it feels like the Monero community is being invited to align itself with Tari, both alongside Tari's development and its eventual goals. Yet I don't feel like the Monero community is fully aware of how this conflation has the potential to degrade the purity of our community, so that's why I am writing this post today. On the one hand you have Monero, perhaps the only pure cryptocurrency project left in the entire space. Bitcoin development has declined to a crawl. Yes, regular commits to its code happen all the time, but fundamentally they have become a traceable surveillance coin, and make no major efforts to change this. Greg Maxwell's Confidential Transactions are just sitting there on the shelf, waiting to be implemented. It's sad, really. Thankfully, there is us. There is Monero. We have all of the benefits of Bitcoin in that we were fairly launched (no premine, founder's share, etc), are decentralized, PoW, and open source. Further our culture reflects the culture of Bitcoin's origins. There is no price talk in Monero. No memes. (Bitcoin's subreddit is overwhelmed with price memes, a harbinger of a dying coin.) Indeed, Monero's community is first passionate about the technology inside it. Some of the most upvoted posts in this sub are actual gd pull requests. So wonderful. I think back to how painfully long it took us to complete the GUI. So many of us were so focused on getting the CLI right that the GUI was delayed for (I think) almost two years. There are precious few coins like that these days. Namecoin is a wonderful exception. Jeremy Rand's recent presentation on how Namecoin has been implented in the Tor-browser is perhaps the most exciting news in cryptoland all year. Unlike 95% of the burning crypto dumpster fire, people may soon actually use Namecoin, typing something like Monero.bit instead of a long difficult aasldkfasdlkfjadlkfj.onion address. And then you have everybody else. 95% of the crypto garbage out there is fundamentally useless if not a straight up scam. Most of the stuff falls into 2 different camps of crap: (Crap 1) useless slick coins with massive marketing budgets, and (Crap 2) reskinned forks. 95% of the garbage out there cares first and foremost about how it appears on the surface, because: the first goal for most cryptos is not making something useful, it's making money. You can have a coin like Dash that "innovates" a PoW by stringing a bunch of hash functions together to make it's X11 algo, but since the wallet software itself impresses people, they don't care. Who cares if there is fundamental collision potential in X11 that could break the coin in a single block? Everything looks sliiick. In short, you can tell if a cryptocurrency is healthy or not if its first goal is making money or making something useful. Thankfully Tari does not seem to be as bad as 95% of the stuff out there. A cursory glance at their repo makes it seem like Fluffypony found talented devs who know their stuff. Further, I think the idea of merge-mining alongside Monero is quite smart. I am a huge fan of Tevador and hyc and the work they did on RandomX, so anything that champions their creation is welcome to me! My hope is we have dozens of merge-mined RandomX coins in the coming decades. Our hash rate will only increase, and the security of our chain will improve. Furthermore, I think Fluffypony himself is a guy with a lot of integrity, so I actually feel a degree of trust towards Tari that I wouldn't naturally feel. The issue is Tari's goals. I say this dispassionately: I am uncertain if Tari's central goal is to make something useful or to make money. Here's an article in Blockchain News announcing Tari. In it, they describe what Tari's software will hopefully do:
in our digital world, these restrictions are unduly limiting for both businesses and consumers, making it costly, difficult, or impossible for digital assets to be resold or transferred,” the announcement stated. “For businesses, this means missing out on the tens of billions of dollars generated each year from secondary resale and trading of the digital goods they issue. For consumers, this means never having true ownership of their digital assets, despite having earned or paid for them.”
Sounds ok. Who wouldn't want the ability to trade scarce digital assets with programmed rules? I certainly would. However, farther down the page you have this:
... those involved with the project include John Pleasants, the former CEO of Ticketmaster and the venture firms Redpoint, Trinity Ventures, Canaan Partners, Slow Ventures, Aspect Ventures, DRW Ventures, Blockchain Capital, Pantera, and Multicoin Capital.
Here is where things get a little hairy, and why I am nervous about the pump-culture of crypto leaking into the tech-culture of Monero. Redpoint is a backer of the scammy gambling website Draft Kings. Blockchain Capital is a backer of Coinbase and Ripple. Pantera put up some of the cash that made ZCash happen. I don't know about you, but it makes me squirm a bit to see Tari's logo alongside ZCash and Ripple. Naturally, the terms of their VC investments are somewhere in black and white, yet there is nothing anywhere on the Tari website about the emission schedule of the coin. In fact, unlike most VC backed crypto out there, Tari doesn't even list their investors. They used to list it in their FAQ as seen on archive.org, but have since removed it. Monero is one of the most hopeful things in the world right now, and it has this special status for me because it cares first and foremost about the technology it is innovating. Decentralized private open-sourced cash. It's an incredible wonderful future that we're all making together. Nothing like Monero has ever existed. But it is more fragile than people realize. It can be slowly killed. This community can eventually become like Bitcoin, stuck in price-memes, if the culture gets sucked away from technology and into profit making. Is it possible for Tari to accept VC money and be solely focused on the technology of a product? Theoretically, yes. But it's not easy. I've had to work with a few small Silicon Valley companies who also accepted VC cash, and returns to their shareholders were a constant source of pressure on them. Will it be for Tari? Monero needed many years to be awkward and small in order to strengthen itself to be the sizable functional coin it is today. Does Tari have this same patience, or will the VCs need payouts sooner than that? If Fluffypony's main goal in Tari is to help people trade digital assets then why didn't he simply launch Tari like Monero, free and open source (FOSS)? Namecoin is FOSS and merge-mined; it has no VC backers. As a worst-case scenario, how long will it be before Tari is "given back to the community", as so many VC-inspired coins have done? Dead code repos all over the corners of cryptoland, discarded after the venture capital firms dumped their premine and took off. There are a lot of unanswered questions here. In closing, I have three suggestions:
Fluffypony should publish the emission schedule as soon as he can, so Tari’s fans can know if there is a premine/founders-share/etc. And perhaps be transparent about how their venture capital investors are being compensated.
People here should think critically before they get involved Tari. It has a different ethos than Monero.
Despite the Fluffypony connection, Rule #4 should be enforced, disallowing posts promoting merge-mined coins like Tari from this forum. If Tari is allowed in this forum, we need our moderators to be honest about whether or not they are investors in Tari and have a conflict of interest. That said, most mods are anonymous, so it's actually impossible to enforce this disclosure. So I guess just enforce Rule #4.
Time to cash out. Satoshi and other early hodlers may never get this chance again.
Here's why at Pierce & Pierce we believe those dormant early hodlers have become active again. and we're going to see more of those 2009 bitcoin addresses cashing out. From 2011 at least, Bitcoin had become a weapon used by the Chinese regime and their 'anarchist' frontmen to weaken the power of the dollar by using economic fallacies, conspiracy theories and old fashioned goldbuggery to convince the public the dollar was going to eventually collapse and die. They believe this collapse could be hastened if everyone dumped the dollar for crypto. Let's suppose for a moment that they weren't behind bitcoin in the first place and that they simply leapt on the opportunities it gave them. The CCP pumped resources (loans, factories, subsidized electricity) into dominating the hash power and mining machines. Eventually, they even found friends to run exchanges and created hundreds of shitcoins (including Tether) to bleed Westerners for several years. Now it's 2020 and the dollar has proven to be resilient even after a pandemic and worldwide recession. The dollar didn't weaken despite trillions of dollars being printed by Jpow. There wasn't a massive rush of real money into creepto coins and gold barely budged after all those new dollars came into circulation. The dollar is historically very strong and even Trump has switched from wanting to weaken the dollar to improve American exports (which would help businesses and consumers a lot) to being proud of a strong dollar (for geo-political reasons). The dollar isn't going anywhere and bitcoin is backed by more and more worthless Tethers. Those early bitcoin hodlers have seen their beliefs fail and are now beginning to make themselves known by moving coins and signing addresses. They need to start cashing out while there is still a chance and with so little real cash available in the cryptocurrency exchanges they will need to get whatever they can soon because something else is on the horizon. It's no secret that US sanctions targeting Chinese officials are being discussed presently. Despite round after round of trade negotiations, the US doesn't trust China will live up to its promises. The CCP has a history of deceit, ripping off western companies, ripping off western investors and won't give up its expansionist ambitions, even after losing so much respect worldwide because of COVID-19 and the treatment of Uighurs, Tibetans and now Hong Kongers. The CCP, being ideologically hardline, is unapologetic. Sanctions against Chinese officials won't work if China pursues its digital currency and blockchain ambitions. These technologies are being embraced by the regime to work their way around potential sanctions, similar to how North Korea has used bitcoin to continue to fund some operations and enrich officials. Last year Trump and Mnuchin signaled what they would need to do if trade talks failed, China didn't live up to their side of the deals, and if sanctions were needed. Trump said 'I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air.... We have only one real currency in the USA, and it is stronger than ever, both dependable and reliable. It is by far the most dominant currency anywhere in the World, and it will always stay that way. It is called the United States Dollar!' Mnuchin created a task force to look into what could be done to regulate cryptocurrencies and related crimes, such as evading sanctions. Could it be that bitcoin's earliest holders have now sensed what's up? They have not only seen that the dollar didn't collapse under mighty pressure, but they are also seeing the possibility that heavy handed global regulations could be put in place to ensure China doesn't evade sanctions by using bitcoin or other related technologies. Anything can happen, but there is a wide sense that the gig's up and it's time to make a dash for the exit. They can't cash out the millions of coins that were minted in the first couple of years but they will try to get whatever they can.
The economics of Bitcoin, why there hasn't been a drop in hashrate, and Blockstream's business model
To me, it seems clear as day why BTC still continues to have a significantly higher hashrate than BCH. When it comes to the reward halvings, obviously BCH's hashrate dropped because it was less profitable to mine BCH when compared to BTC. One interesting thing is that the same didn't happen to BTC at the time. I think this can be explained for a few reasons:
The fee-market created by BTC makes it significantly more profitable for miners to continue mining BTC rather than BCH. This means that financially, miners have no incentive to switch to BCH because they won't get the extra revenue they get from high mining fees. As long as Blockstream can keep holding off the actual use of sidechains, BTC will continue to grow. Along with this, they are spreading the narrative that Bitcoin is digital gold, which will make other people see high fees as justified and reasonable.
As long as mining BTC is more profitable than mining BCH, the hashrate of BCH will continue to stagnate or even potentially fall. The fact that there is a dev tax implemented does not help this at all. Why would anyone mine BCH when 12.5% of their revenue is being taken away from them?
Eventually, when Blockstream decides to implement sidechains (and keep in mind that this will be planned very strategically at the most convenient time), miners will be incentivized to switch over. This could be after Blockstream manages to kill off BCH or any other SHA 256 coin. Their propaganda about BCH being a pump and dump coin has already been successful in making sure the community doesn't support BCH as much as they might if they knew the truth.
I'm no computer scientist, but this gives me a few ideas. I think we would all be better off if we took out the dev tax, replacing it with PURELY voluntary transaction fees. If we can voluntarily pay slightly more for a transaction, it would make more sense for miners to switch over to our network. Not only this, but I think we should voluntarily use our funds to help with development of BCH.
How can I explain to my dad that bitcoin is not a scam and is legit.
I’ve been obsessed with crypto for about 4 years now and I’ve only been able to mine various coins. I’ve always wanted to buy crypto but my dad never opened an account for me. Although he did open one in late 2017 for himself and made out well with the huge increase in bitcoin. He keeps saying that there’s nothing to back up the price, it’s too volatile and I’ll lose all my money even though I’m not going to trade and I want to hold for years to come. He also said that everybody who develops cryptocurrency only does it for money just to pump and dump. I’m 16 if you wondered. Thanks!
[Wyoming, US] Is it legal for a website to falsely claim to be registered in this state?
I don't want to give the website hits, so I'm leaving the URL out of this post. A cryptocurrency YouTuber with a modest following caught my attention about a year ago and I have used my OSINT skills to reasonably conclude he's a con man. I've got about 40 screenshots confirming he is using a pseudonym, has lied about being a special operator in the U.S. military, has multiple felony convictions, and he is grossly exaggerating his success in cryptocurrency. All of this has been in service to pump-and-dump schemes involving alternatives to Bitcoin. His latest venture is an online course in becoming a social media influencer. Someone with OSINT skills exceeding mine has published a blog post outlining it as a scam using a lot of the old tricks, like buying "Likes," "Friends," and reviews. This time, he has name-dropped an extremely popular YouTuber but there's no indication they've even heard of him. My first thought was to shoot that YouTuber's talent management office a screenshot of the use of their likeness and the URL, but that's where I'm stuck. His website has a "terms of service" that looks legitimate, but the address is for a P.O. Box in Wyoming (he is not, nor has he ever been a resident there). The Wyoming Secretary of State business registry has no record of any LLC or SP that uses the address. I spoke to an ex of his and she said in the past he would claim his "business" was incorporated somewhere and simply not file any paperwork to save money. I sent an e-mail to the Wyoming SoS with the link and asking an approximation of this question, but they simply said they were "just an office for filing" and suggested that a lawyer might be able to help me. I can't think of a way to effectively warn people who might be duped, so I feel like I have a moral obligation to deplatform him. That said, I really can't afford to drop whatever amount a lawyer would require for a consultation. Is what he's doing illegal? To whom should I share my evidence that he's lying about these things to enrich himself?
Dear Friends, Bitcoin halving took place and it was largely uneventful. Except a few large "whale dumps" and "bull pumps" which essentially evened out, the event felt kind of like crossing the singularity of a black hole. You don't feel it when you cross it, but the negative supply shock is irreversible, in both real and "cosmic" terms. With most cryptocurrencies tied to BTC as their primary trading pair, a slight rise in price levels has begun, with small caps (Bronze Index) being most pronounced. Here's the scoop for our three indices... Gold Index - After about 8 weeks of continuous gains, the large caps took a little break, with 1.2% decline which likely signals a short-term correction. The level of the current correction (corresponding to previous well-established resistance/support levels) suggests that we are consolidating for the time being, but the overall longer-term bull trend is as yet unbroken. Silver Index - Although the mid-caps managed to squeeze out a marginal (0.3%) gain for the week, they seem to be following the Gold Index in terms of the general trend. Given this observation, it is likely that we will see a short-term correction (and consolidation) right around the current level. The worst-case scenario is a new base formation right around $17 - just below the current level. After that, the long-term bull case is the most likely outcome. Bronze Index - Currently the small-caps appear to be in an upside breakout position. After 8+ weeks of continuous uptrend and reaching an all-time-high this week, the momentum seems to be pushing strongly to continued new highs. In a way of potential support levels (in case the rally fails) we now have a pretty well defined support right around $90-95, which will take a significant amount of downward pressure to break. Other EWMCI Developments: A new page with useful resources and tools for crypto enthusiasts established at "tools.ewmci.org". Over time, additional links will be added as per community suggestions. I am also pleased to announce that between our fiat-to-crypto bridges and allied exchanges, one does not need to rely on any other external resource to acquire EWMCI index constituent currencies. This is indeed a huge accomplishment and marks an important step toward the EWMCI Ecosystem becoming internally self-reliant and independent of third-party influences. As such, we are perfectly positioned to continue our mission of being a neutral arbiter of quality and value for cryptocurrency end-users. Big shout out to our EWMCI Strategic Partners, the "EWMCI 11," BexCrypto, Auscoi, Crypto Beast, CoinGecko, CoinPaprika, Magnum Wallet (our official multi wallet), MadCatMining, Fides Exchange, NLExch, TheCoin.pw, and Zapple.com. Your efforts, high quality of service, and dedication to transparency, honesty and most importantly crypto end-users are truly appreciated! Also, welcome FeatherLite (eBay crypto merchant) to the Alliance! Till next week! Stan / EWMCI.info Embrace DIY Crypto Index Investing - Your wallet, your keys, your control, your timing, your terms, your decisions!
The issuers behind the Pump and Dump accumulated and set up their positions early, then they start together with the community the actual pump. The signal to the user of the free channels will be given, once the coin is already pre-pumped, the novice traders see big green candles, want to jump in, but the group behind already pulls out and uses In my opinion, bitcoin a colossal pump-and-dump scheme, the likes of which the world has never seen. In a pump-and-dump game, promoters "pump" up the price of a security creating a speculative The crypto market has yet again seen the signs of a pump and dump. Not that they have been completely eradicated from the market since the 2017 bull market but in the past few years as the market corrected and then consolidated, the blatant pump and dumps took a rest. Welcome to crypto, even in 2020: yesterday Bitcoin finally made a move and reached the highest price areas of mid-February near $10,500. Just hours after, and we are back down at the prices of the past days once again. A classic pump and dump: Usually, you see those types of price manipulations in low-cap coins. However, from time to time, the “Bitcoin pump & dumpers are losing their mojo. They managed to pump the price by $550 in one minute, a 7.5% spike. Yet the dump reversed the entire pump with an 8% drop in just 7.5 hours. If #Bitcoin pumpers can no longer sucker in new buyers the game is over. Look out below!” Bitcoin pump & dumpers are losing their mojo.
#bitcoin #twitter #crypto #interest #stockmarket #recession #bearmarket #bullmarket #davincij15 #mmcrypto #btc #bitcoinprice #bitcointoday #crash #economy #inflation #ecb #fed #federalreserve # ... This is the recording of pumps and dumps in BitMex. It benefits those who need to perform the studies on the actual price movement of XBTUSD or bitcoin. Brian Armstrong News: Coinbase Pro, Bitcoin Mining, BTC Price CoinbasePRO US 2,001 watching. ... Bitcoin To Pump To $11,500 Or Dump To 8,800$? 7 Experts Share Their Take - Duration: 11:24. 🔲 My Top 3 Recommended Exchanges 🔵 Phemex http://bit.ly/JackPhemex - $120 FREE Bonus 🟠 Bybit http://bit.ly/JackBybit - $90 FREE Bonus 🟣 DueDex https://www ... Aslamo-Ala-Kum Friends IN This bitcoin trading tutorial i explain what is bitcoin pump and dump and how to avoid loss in bitcoin's sudden dump and pump i also explain what are fake pumps and dumps ...